Putting It All In Perspective

While this body of data is impressive, it can be made more useful by comparing it to similar data obtained by testing three other cables from high-end consumer and professional cable manufacturers. Two of the manufacturers chosen are located in the San Francisco area, and the other is located in Indiana.  We call them "Cables A, B and C".  Note that at the cenibel level, their frequency graphs show substantially wider frequency variances than do the Zaolla Silverline cables tested. These are variances that would not have been apparent in a decibel chart. 

At one-tenth of a dB resolution, as shown here, the influences of the conductor material upon frequency response become quite obvious.  Compare the wavy lines made by Cables A, B and C to the relatively flat frequency response graph for the Zaolla Microphone cable .  Cables A, B and C were all made of high-quality copper containing a minimum of oxides or oxygen, yet all three show substantially greater variation in frequency response that does the Zaolla cable when all are graphed at the cenibel scale. 
 

No "Voodoo Physics"

As you can see from our testing, Zaolla's superior sound quality comes from its scientific advantages and attention to quality.  We don't use "voodoo physics" to try to explain audible phenomena.  We don't insult your intelligence by using copper wire with special "unobtanium" insulation filled with air, water, or cream cheese.  After all, no matter how you dress it up, it's still just copper wire, not silver.  No matter how exotic or fancy the copper cable, it's the putting mud flaps on a old car and expecting it to go 50 mph faster.  Even though the Zaolla silver cables are technically and sonically superior, they usually cost less than the so called "high-end" audiophile cables. 

Take a "test drive" on the new Zaolla Silverline cables...you'll be amazed.